TX: Corporation tax
30 free practice questions on corporation tax, Section E of the ACCA Taxation: UK (TX) question bank. Topics include CT, Corporation tax, CT groups. Each question carries its syllabus reference and a worked explanation. Practise them in the quiz with instant feedback, or read every question with its answer further down this page.
→ Full TX question bank and timed mock exam
→ TX Common Mistakes
→ TX Formula Sheet
Loading questions…
All 30 corporation tax questions
The same questions the quiz above draws on, in syllabus order, each with its answer and worked explanation. All 30 are multiple choice.
Jade Ltd starts trading on 1 October 2025 and prepares its first accounts to 30 September 2027 (24 months). How many corporation tax accounting periods does this span?
- One 24-month accounting period
- Two 12-month accounting periods
- One 12-month and one 6-month accounting period
- Three 8-month accounting periods
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. A corporation tax accounting period cannot exceed 12 months. A 24-month period of account must be split into two 12-month accounting periods: 1 October 2025 to 30 September 2026, and 1 October 2026 to 30 September 2027. Option A is wrong — accounting periods are capped at 12 months. Options C and D describe incorrect splits.
Which of the following costs is NOT allowable in computing a company's tax-adjusted trading profit?
- Salaries and wages paid to employees
- Depreciation charged in the accounts
- Professional fees for preparing the company's tax return
- Staff training costs related to the trade
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Depreciation is not an allowable deduction for corporation tax — it is added back and capital allowances are claimed instead. Salaries (A), tax return preparation fees (C), and staff training (D) are all allowable trading expenses incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the trade.
Crestwood Ltd borrows £200,000 from a bank and pays interest of £8,000. It also deposits surplus cash and earns interest of £2,500. How are these items treated for corporation tax?
- Interest paid is disallowed; interest received is taxable
- Both interest paid and received are dealt with through the loan relationships rules: interest paid is deductible, interest received is taxable as a non-trading credit
- Interest paid reduces taxable profits; interest received is exempt
- Both items are treated as part of trading profit/loss
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. The loan relationships rules apply to all interest income and expense for companies. Interest paid on a borrowing is a debit (deductible), reducing taxable profits. Interest received is a non-trading credit, added to taxable income. This treatment applies regardless of whether the loan is for trading or non-trading purposes. Option A incorrectly disallows the interest paid. Option C incorrectly exempts interest received. Option D is wrong — loan relationship debits and credits are treated under a separate regime, not as trading items.
Millstone Ltd makes a qualifying charitable donation (QCD) of £5,000 in its accounting period. How is this treated in computing taxable total profits?
- Deducted from trading profits
- Added to taxable total profits
- Deducted from total profits after adding all income streams together
- Deducted from the corporation tax liability at the basic rate
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. QCDs are deducted from total profits after all income streams have been aggregated — they are not deducted in computing trading profits. This means QCDs cannot create or increase a trading loss. They reduce the overall taxable total profits. Option A is wrong — QCDs are not a trading deduction. Option B is wrong — they reduce, not add to, profits. Option D is wrong — they are a deduction from profits, not a tax credit.
Bridford Ltd has taxable total profits of £180,000 for the year ended 31 March 2026. It has no associated companies. The main rate is 25%, small profits rate 19%, lower limit £50,000, upper limit £250,000, standard fraction 3/200. What is the corporation tax liability?
- £45,000
- £43,950
- £34,200
- £40,500
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Profits of £180,000 fall between the lower limit (£50,000) and upper limit (£250,000), so marginal relief applies. Step 1 — CT at main rate: £180,000 × 25% = £45,000. Step 2 — marginal relief: (Upper limit − Augmented profits) × Standard fraction = (£250,000 − £180,000) × 3/200 = £70,000 × 0.015 = £1,050. Step 3 — CT payable: £45,000 − £1,050 = £43,950 — option B. Option A (£45,000) applies the main rate with no marginal relief — the error of treating profits above £50,000 as automatically subject to the full 25% with no further adjustment. Option C (£34,200 = £180,000 × 19%) wrongly applies the small profits rate; this only applies when profits are at or below £50,000. Option D makes an error in the marginal relief calculation, possibly using the wrong standard fraction or limits.
Compact Ltd has taxable total profits of £45,000 for the year ended 31 March 2026. It has no associated companies. What is its corporation tax liability?
- £11,250
- £9,000
- £8,550
- £11,000
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Profits of £45,000 are below the lower limit of £50,000 (no associated companies), so the small profits rate of 19% applies. CT = £45,000 × 19% = £8,550. Option A (£11,250) applies the main rate of 25%: £45,000 × 25% = £11,250. Option B (£9,000) uses an incorrect rate. Option D (£11,000) also uses a wrong rate.
Pinewood Ltd has an unrelieved trading loss of £40,000 carried forward from a prior year. In the current year it has trading profits of £65,000 and bank interest (non-trading) of £5,000. How are the carried forward losses relieved?
- Against total profits (trading + interest) of the current year
- Against trading profits only of the same trade — the loss cannot be used against the bank interest
- Against total profits but only if a specific claim is made within two years
- Automatically against any future income of the company
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Trading losses carried forward prior to 1 April 2017 can only be set against future trading profits of the same trade. They cannot be set against non-trading income such as bank interest. This means only £40,000 of the £65,000 trading profit is sheltered — the £5,000 interest income remains taxable. Note: the restriction on offsetting against total income applies to pre-April 2017 carried forward losses. Post-April 2017 losses have more flexibility.
Oakdale Ltd makes a trading loss of £80,000 in the year ended 31 March 2026. It had taxable profits of £120,000 in the year ended 31 March 2025. What is the maximum loss that can be relieved under carry back, and against which year?
- £80,000 against the year ended 31 March 2024
- £80,000 against the year ended 31 March 2025
- £40,000 against the year ended 31 March 2025
- £80,000 against any of the preceding three years
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. A company can carry back a trading loss to set against total profits of the immediately preceding 12-month accounting period (1 year carry back). The full £80,000 can be carried back against the £120,000 profits of the year ended 31 March 2025. Option A goes back 2 years — the basic carry back is 1 year. Option C (£40,000) restricts the amount incorrectly. Option D — a 3-year carry back is only available for terminal losses on cessation.
Greystone Ltd sells a commercial property in January 2026. The property cost £200,000 in April 2015. The indexation factor from April 2015 to December 2017 is 0.092 (indexation allowance frozen at December 2017). What is the indexation allowance?
- £18,400
- £24,000
- £9,200
- £200,000
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. The indexation allowance for companies is calculated as: cost × indexation factor = £200,000 × 0.092 = £18,400. This reduces the chargeable gain. Note: indexation allowance for companies was frozen at December 2017 — the factor applies from the date of purchase to December 2017 only, even if the asset is sold later. Option B uses a different factor. Option C halves the correct answer. Option D uses the full cost.
Alpha Ltd owns 80% of Beta Ltd. Beta Ltd has a trading loss of £60,000 in the current accounting period. Alpha Ltd has taxable profits of £90,000. Both companies are UK resident. Can group relief be claimed, and if so, what is the maximum surrenderable?
- No — group relief requires 100% ownership
- Yes — up to £60,000 can be surrendered to Alpha Ltd
- Yes — but only £48,000 (80% × £60,000) can be surrendered
- Yes — Beta Ltd can surrender its entire loss to any UK group member
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Group relief requires a 75% group relationship — one company must own at least 75% of the other, directly or indirectly. Alpha owns 80% of Beta, which exceeds 75%, so relief is available. The whole loss of £60,000 can be surrendered to Alpha (and Alpha has enough taxable profit, £90,000, to absorb it). The 80% ownership does not scale down the amount — group relief is all-or-nothing once the 75% test is met. Option A is wrong; 100% ownership is not required. Option C wrongly applies a proportionate 80% limit. Option D also recognises that the full loss is surrenderable, but is loosely worded — the loss is surrendered to a fellow 75% group member, here Alpha specifically, which is why option B is the precise answer.
Bluebell Ltd sells shares in Primrose Ltd in March 2026 for £180,000. The shares were purchased in 2010 for £90,000. The indexation factor from 2010 to December 2017 is 0.230. What is the chargeable gain?
- £90,000
- £69,300
- £69,300 before indexation; nil after indexation is applied
- £20,700
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Indexed cost = £90,000 × (1 + 0.230) = £90,000 + (£90,000 × 0.230) = £90,000 + £20,700 = £110,700. Chargeable gain = £180,000 − £110,700 = £69,300. Note: indexation allowance cannot create or increase a loss — it can only reduce the gain to nil. Option A (£90,000) ignores indexation. Option C incorrectly suggests the gain is nil. Option D (£20,700) is the indexation allowance only.
Fernwood Ltd has the following for the year ended 31 March 2026: trading profit £280,000; bank interest received £12,000; chargeable gain £25,000; QCD paid £8,000. What are taxable total profits?
- £309,000
- £301,000
- £317,000
- £280,000
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. Taxable total profits: Trading profit £280,000 + Non-trading loan relationship credit (bank interest) £12,000 + Chargeable gain £25,000 = Total profits £317,000. Less QCD £8,000. Taxable total profits = £309,000. Option B (£301,000) deducts the QCD from trading profits instead of total profits. Option C (£317,000) does not deduct the QCD. Option D ignores interest and the gain.
Under UK tax law, when is a company treated as UK resident?
- When it is registered in England and Wales
- When it is incorporated in the UK, or when its central management and control is exercised in the UK
- When the majority of its shareholders are UK residents
- When more than 50% of its trading activity takes place in the UK
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. A company is UK resident if it is incorporated in the UK, OR if its central management and control (the strategic decisions made by the board) is exercised in the UK. Both tests are used — a foreign-incorporated company can still be UK resident if controlled from the UK. Option A (registered in England and Wales) is too narrow — registration alone is not the test. Options C and D are not relevant residency tests for companies.
Thornton Ltd's main pool tax written down value at 1 April 2025 is £85,000. During the year ended 31 March 2026 the company buys equipment for £30,000 and disposes of an asset (original cost £15,000; proceeds £8,000; no AIA was claimed on this asset). AIA limit £1,000,000. What are the total capital allowances?
- £30,000 AIA + 18% WDA on £93,000 = £46,740
- £30,000 AIA + 18% WDA on £85,000 = £45,300
- £30,000 AIA + 18% WDA on £77,000 = £43,860
- 18% WDA on £107,000 = £19,260
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. AIA: £30,000 on new equipment. Pool: WDV b/f £85,000 − disposal proceeds £8,000 = £77,000. (The disposed asset's proceeds are deducted from the pool, not the original cost.) WDA: £77,000 × 18% = £13,860. Total: £30,000 + £13,860 = £43,860. Option A incorrectly adds the new equipment to the pool before deducting disposal proceeds. Option B also calculates the pool balance incorrectly. Option D does not claim AIA.
Gamma Ltd and Delta Ltd are in a 75% chargeable gains group. Gamma Ltd transfers an asset to Delta Ltd at its book value of £40,000. The asset's market value is £70,000. What are the CT implications of this transfer?
- Gamma Ltd realises a gain of £30,000 immediately
- The transfer is at no gain no loss — Gamma Ltd is treated as disposing at a value giving no gain or loss
- Delta Ltd acquires the asset at market value of £70,000
- Gamma Ltd can elect to transfer the gain to Delta Ltd
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Intragroup asset transfers within a 75% chargeable gains group are made on a no gain/no loss basis — Gamma Ltd is deemed to dispose of the asset at a value that gives no chargeable gain and no allowable loss. Delta Ltd acquires the asset at the same base cost as Gamma Ltd held it (not market value). The gain is deferred until Delta Ltd disposes of the asset outside the group. Option A triggers an immediate gain — wrong. Option C gives Delta market value — wrong. Option D (electing to transfer the gain) is not relevant here.
Before beginning to trade, Hartley Ltd spent £15,000 on market research in the 12 months prior to commencing trade. This expenditure would have been allowable if incurred after trading began. How is this treated for corporation tax?
- It is not allowable — pre-trading costs cannot be deducted
- It is treated as incurred on the first day of trading and deducted in that accounting period
- It is capitalised and written off over 5 years
- It is deductible as a one-off start-up allowance
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Pre-trading expenditure of a revenue nature incurred in the 7 years before trading commences is treated as if incurred on the first day of trading. The £15,000 market research cost is deductible in the first accounting period. Option A is wrong — specific relief exists. Option C is wrong — this is revenue expenditure, not capitalised. Option D is wrong — there is no 'start-up allowance' per se.
Redwood Ltd has one associated company. For the year ended 31 March 2026, what are the lower and upper limits for determining the applicable CT rate?
- £50,000 and £250,000
- £25,000 and £125,000
- £100,000 and £500,000
- £50,000 and £500,000
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Where a company has associated companies, the lower and upper limits are divided by the number of associated companies plus one (the company itself). Redwood has 1 associate, so total = 2 companies. Lower limit = £50,000 / 2 = £25,000. Upper limit = £250,000 / 2 = £125,000. Option A gives the standard limits without adjustment. Option C doubles the limits incorrectly. Option D is also wrong.
Mercer Ltd sells a factory for £600,000 in April 2025, realising a gain of £200,000. It acquires a new qualifying business asset for £550,000 in March 2026. What gain is immediately chargeable?
- £200,000 — no rollover relief available as proceeds not fully reinvested
- £50,000 — the amount of proceeds not reinvested
- £150,000 — the gain not deferred
- £0 — the full gain is deferred
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Rollover relief defers the gain to the extent proceeds are reinvested. Proceeds not reinvested = £600,000 − £550,000 = £50,000. This £50,000 is immediately chargeable. The remaining gain (£200,000 − £50,000 = £150,000) is deferred and deducted from the base cost of the new asset. Option A wrongly denies all rollover relief. Option C is the deferred gain, not the immediately chargeable amount. Option D requires full reinvestment of proceeds.
Harrington Ltd receives annual rent of £84,000 from a commercial property. The company pays insurance of £2,400, repairs of £8,600, and managing agent fees of £4,200. What is the property business profit?
- £84,000
- £80,000
- £68,800
- £72,600
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Property business profit = Rent − Allowable deductions. Allowable: insurance £2,400 + repairs £8,600 + managing agent fees £4,200 = £15,200. (Note: unlike residential property for individuals, there is no finance cost restriction for companies.) Profit = £84,000 − £15,200 = £68,800. Option A uses gross rent. Option B makes an incorrect deduction. Option D also makes an error.
Dalby Ltd has an 18-month period of account ending 30 September 2026 with trading profits of £360,000. How are the profits split between the two accounting periods?
- £240,000 in year 1; £120,000 in year 2
- £180,000 in each period
- £200,000 in year 1; £160,000 in year 2
- £360,000 all in year 2
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. A long period of account is split into a 12-month accounting period and a short period. Trading profits are apportioned on a time basis: Year 1 (12 months) = £360,000 × 12/18 = £240,000. Year 2 (6 months) = £360,000 × 6/18 = £120,000. Option B splits equally (9 months each) — wrong. Option C uses incorrect proportions. Option D allocates all profit to year 2 — wrong.
A small or medium-sized enterprise (SME) spends £100,000 on qualifying R&D in its accounting period. The R&D additional deduction for SMEs is 86%. What is the total CT deduction for R&D expenditure?
- £100,000
- £186,000
- £86,000
- £200,000
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. SMEs can claim an additional deduction of 86% of qualifying R&D expenditure (under the merged RDEC/SME scheme rates for 2025-26). Total deduction = £100,000 + (£100,000 × 86%) = £100,000 + £86,000 = £186,000. This enhanced deduction reduces taxable profits. Option A is the base expenditure only. Option C is the additional deduction only. Option D uses an incorrect rate.
Windmill Ltd has the following loan relationship items in its year ended 31 March 2026: interest received on a bank deposit £4,200; interest paid on a trade loan £9,500; interest paid on a loan to purchase an investment property £3,100. How are these items treated?
- All three items are netted and treated as a non-trading deficit
- Interest paid on trade loan (£9,500) is a trading debit; interest received (£4,200) and investment property interest paid (£3,100) are non-trading items — net non-trading deficit £1,100 set against total profits
- All three are added together and deducted from trading profits
- Interest received is trading income; all interest paid is non-trading
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Loan relationships are classified as trading or non-trading. Interest on a loan for trading purposes = trading debit (deductible in computing trading profits). Interest on a loan for non-trading purposes (investment property) and interest received on deposits = non-trading items. Non-trading: credit £4,200 − debit £3,100 = net credit £1,100 (taxable). Total: trading debit (£9,500) deducted from trading profits; £1,100 non-trading credit added to total profits. Option A nets all items together incorrectly. Option C treats all items as trading. Option D misclassifies the trading loan.
Portside Ltd pays its managing director a salary of £250,000, which HMRC considers excessive compared to the market rate of £120,000. What is the allowable deduction for CT purposes?
- £250,000 — all salary costs are allowable
- £120,000 — only the market rate element is allowable
- £0 — HMRC can disallow all excessive payments
- £250,000, but the excess of £130,000 is taxed as a benefit
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. For a deduction to be allowable it must be incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the trade. Where remuneration is considered excessive, HMRC may restrict the deduction to the amount that is commercially justifiable — typically the market rate. The excess (£130,000) is disallowed. Option A allows the full amount — incorrect if HMRC challenges the excess. Option C is too extreme — HMRC would not disallow the entire salary. Option D is incorrect — the excess is not taxed as a benefit; it is simply disallowed.
Crestline Ltd has held 15% of the shares in Aldgate Ltd (a trading company) for the past 5 years. It sells its entire shareholding for £2,000,000, realising a gain of £800,000. What is the CT treatment?
- £800,000 is fully chargeable to CT
- The gain is exempt under the substantial shareholding exemption (SSE)
- The gain qualifies for rollover relief automatically
- Indexation allowance reduces the gain to nil
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. The substantial shareholding exemption (SSE) exempts gains on the disposal of shares where: the investing company has held at least 10% of the ordinary share capital for a continuous 12-month period in the 6 years before disposal; and both companies are trading companies (or members of a trading group). Crestline holds 15% (above 10%) for 5 years — SSE applies. The gain of £800,000 is fully exempt. Option A charges the gain — SSE prevents this. Option C — rollover relief requires reinvestment. Option D — indexation only reduces, not exempts.
Smallco Ltd is not a large company and has a 12-month accounting period ending 31 December 2025. When is its corporation tax due?
- 31 December 2025
- 31 March 2026
- 31 August 2026
- 1 October 2026
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. Non-large companies pay CT as a single payment 9 months and 1 day after the end of the accounting period. For a year ending 31 December 2025: 31 December 2025 + 9 months = 30 September 2026 + 1 day = 1 October 2026. Option A is the end of the accounting period itself. Option B is 3 months after year end. Option C is 8 months after year end. The correct date is 1 October 2026.
Four companies each own 25% of Link Ltd. Link Ltd makes a trading loss of £200,000. Company A (which owns 25%) has profits of £150,000. What is the maximum loss that can be surrendered to Company A via consortium relief?
- £200,000
- £50,000
- £37,500
- £150,000
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Consortium relief allows losses to be surrendered between a consortium company and its consortium members. The maximum surrender to any one member is limited to: the lower of (i) the surrendering company's loss × member's ownership % and (ii) the claimant's profits. Company A owns 25% of Link Ltd. Maximum surrender = £200,000 × 25% = £50,000. This is also below Company A's profits of £150,000. So maximum = £50,000. Option A (£200,000) gives the full loss without applying the ownership %. Option C is 25% × £150,000. Option D is Company A's full profits.
Which of the following costs incurred by a company would be DISALLOWED in computing its tax-adjusted trading profit?
- Wages paid to factory workers
- Legal fees for renewing a short lease
- A fine for breach of health and safety regulations
- Contribution to employees' pension scheme
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Fines and penalties imposed by law are not allowable deductions — they are not incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the trade; allowing them would undermine the deterrent purpose of the fine. Wages (A) are allowable. Legal fees for renewing a short lease (B) are revenue expenditure and allowable. Pension contributions (D) are allowable when paid.
Orion Ltd transfers a building to its 100% subsidiary, Sirius Ltd. The building cost £300,000 and is worth £480,000. What is the CT treatment of this transfer?
- Orion Ltd has a chargeable gain of £180,000
- Sirius Ltd acquires the building at market value £480,000
- The transfer is on a no gain/no loss basis — Orion Ltd has no gain; Sirius Ltd acquires at £300,000
- A group rollover relief election is required
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Intragroup transfers between companies in a 75% chargeable gains group are automatically made on a no gain/no loss basis — no election is needed. Orion Ltd is treated as disposing at a value giving no gain or loss. Sirius Ltd acquires at Orion Ltd's original base cost of £300,000 (plus indexation to December 2017). The gain is effectively deferred until Sirius Ltd disposes of the asset outside the group. Option A triggers an immediate gain — wrong. Option B gives Sirius market value — wrong. Option D suggests an election is needed — not required for automatic no gain/no loss treatment.
Which of the following types of income is subject to corporation tax for a UK resident company?
- Employment income from directors' remuneration
- Dividends received from UK companies
- Trading profits and chargeable gains
- Capital gains only — income is taxed as income tax
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. UK resident companies pay corporation tax on all their profits, which includes trading income, non-trading income (such as rental income, loan relationship credits), and chargeable gains — all subject to CT. Option A is wrong — directors' remuneration is employment income taxed on the directors personally (PAYE), not CT on the company. Option B — dividends from UK companies are generally exempt from CT under the dividend exemption rules. Option D is wrong — companies do not pay capital gains tax; gains are included within CT.
Parent Ltd owns 80% of Sub Ltd. Sub Ltd's accounting period is 1 January 2025 to 31 December 2025. Parent Ltd's accounting period is 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026. For group relief purposes, what is the overlapping period?
- 1 January 2025 to 31 March 2026
- 1 April 2025 to 31 December 2025
- 1 January 2025 to 31 December 2025
- 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Group relief can only be surrendered in respect of the overlapping period of the two companies' accounting periods. Sub Ltd: 1 Jan 2025 to 31 Dec 2025. Parent Ltd: 1 Apr 2025 to 31 Mar 2026. Overlap = the period common to both = 1 April 2025 to 31 December 2025. The surrenderable loss and claimant's profits are time-apportioned to this overlap period. Option A spans the full range of both periods. Options C and D give incorrect overlaps.
Other TX topics
- UK tax system and administration (15 questions)
- Income tax and NIC (45 questions)
- Capital gains tax (25 questions)
- Inheritance tax (15 questions)
- VAT (20 questions)
- All TX sections, with the timed mock exam
- Spotted a mistake? Report it and it will be corrected.