← LW: all sections
ACCA · Applied Skills

LW: Management and administration

22 free practice questions on management and administration, Section F of the ACCA Corporate and Business Law (LW: English) (LW) question bank. Topics include Appointment of directors, Shadow directors, Duty to promote success, Duty to avoid conflicts of interest, Duty of care, skill and diligence, Consequences of breach of duty. Each question carries its syllabus reference and a worked explanation. Practise them in the quiz with instant feedback, or read every question with its answer further down this page.

→ Full LW question bank and timed mock exam
→ LW Common Mistakes

Explanations shown after each answer. Skip freely. No time limit.
Section:
0
answered
0
correct
—
score
—
remaining
Question 1

Loading questions…

All 22 management and administration questions

The same questions the quiz above draws on, in syllabus order, each with its answer and worked explanation. All 22 are multiple choice.

Question 1 · Syllabus ref F1b · Appointment of directors

How are directors of a company usually appointed after incorporation?

  1. By the Registrar of Companies
  2. By the company's external auditors at the year end
  3. By the company's members, typically by ordinary resolution, or as provided in the articles
  4. By the company's largest creditor
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C. After the first directors named on incorporation, directors are usually appointed by the members (commonly by ordinary resolution) or in accordance with the procedure in the articles, which may also permit the board to appoint additional directors. Option A is wrong — the Registrar records but does not appoint directors. Options B and D are wrong — auditors and creditors have no power to appoint directors.

Question 2 · Syllabus ref F1a · Shadow directors

A person who has not been formally appointed but in accordance with whose directions the board is accustomed to act is known as what?

  1. A company secretary
  2. A debenture holder
  3. An auditor
  4. A shadow director
Show answer and explanation

Answer: D. A shadow director is a person, not formally appointed, in accordance with whose directions or instructions the directors are accustomed to act; such a person can attract many directors' duties and liabilities. Option A is wrong — the secretary is a separate officer. Option C is wrong — an auditor reports on the accounts. Option B is wrong — a debenture holder is a creditor, not a director by influence.

Question 3 · Syllabus ref F1d · Duty to promote success

Under the Companies Act 2006, the duty to promote the success of the company requires a director to act in the way they consider, in good faith, would be most likely to:

  1. Promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole, having regard to wider factors
  2. Maximise the director's own personal income
  3. Benefit the company's largest single customer above all others
  4. Avoid ever taking any business risk
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. The s.172 duty requires a director to act in the way they consider, in good faith, would most likely promote the success of the company for the benefit of the members as a whole, while having regard to factors such as long-term consequences, employees, suppliers, customers, the environment and reputation. Option B describes self-interest. Option C wrongly elevates one customer. Option D is wrong — the duty does not require risk-avoidance.

Question 4 · Syllabus ref F1d · Duty to avoid conflicts of interest

Under the directors' duties in the Companies Act 2006, a director must avoid a situation in which:

  1. They hold any shares in the company at all
  2. They have, or can have, a direct or indirect interest that conflicts, or may conflict, with the interests of the company, unless authorised
  3. They attend a board meeting and take part in the discussion
  4. They are paid a salary approved by the company
Show answer and explanation

Answer: B. The duty to avoid conflicts requires a director to avoid situations where they have, or could have, a direct or indirect interest conflicting (or possibly conflicting) with the company's interests, unless duly authorised. Option A is wrong — holding shares is not itself a breach. Option C is wrong — attending board meetings is a normal function. Option D is wrong — properly approved remuneration is permitted.

Question 5 · Syllabus ref F1d · Duty of care, skill and diligence

How is the standard of a director's duty of reasonable care, skill and diligence assessed under the Companies Act 2006?

  1. By an objective minimum standard, raised by any greater actual knowledge, skill and experience the particular director has
  2. By a purely subjective test based only on the individual director's own knowledge
  3. By reference solely to the company's profits
  4. By the average standard of directors across all UK companies
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. The duty applies a twin test: an objective minimum standard of a reasonably diligent person with the general knowledge, skill and experience reasonably expected of someone in that role, raised where the particular director actually has greater knowledge, skill or experience. Option B omits the objective floor. Option C is irrelevant — profits do not set the standard. Option D is wrong — the test is not an average standard across all directors.

Question 6 · Syllabus ref F1d · Consequences of breach of duty

Which of the following is a possible consequence where a director breaches a general duty owed to the company?

  1. The director is automatically imprisoned
  2. Nothing can ever be done about a breach of duty by a director
  3. The director may have to account for profits, pay damages, or the transaction may be set aside
  4. Only the company secretary can be liable
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C. Breach of a general duty can lead to civil consequences such as an account of profits, restoration of company property, damages or compensation, or rescission of the relevant contract; the members may also be able to ratify certain breaches. Option A is wrong — breach of a general duty is not automatically criminal. Option B is wrong — remedies exist. Option D wrongly shifts liability to the secretary.

Question 7 · Syllabus ref F1b · Removal of a director

How may the members remove a director from office under the Companies Act 2006?

  1. By ordinary resolution of which special notice has been given, subject to the director's right to make representations
  2. Only by a unanimous decision of the whole board of directors
  3. Only with the approval of the Registrar of Companies
  4. A director can never be removed before the end of their term
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. Members may remove a director by ordinary resolution (a simple majority), provided special notice of the resolution is given and the director may make representations; this is subject to any contractual claims, such as for wrongful dismissal. Option B is wrong — removal is a members', not solely a board, power. Option C is wrong — the Registrar's approval is not required. Option D is wrong — directors can be removed in this way.

Question 8 · Syllabus ref F1b · Disqualification of directors

Under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, on which ground may a person be disqualified from acting as a director?

  1. Owning shares in more than one company
  2. Voting against a board resolution
  3. Being over the age of seventy
  4. Unfitness in the management of a company that has become insolvent
Show answer and explanation

Answer: D. Disqualification can be ordered on grounds including conduct showing unfitness as a director of an insolvent company, persistent breaches of companies legislation, fraud in a winding up, or conviction for certain offences. Option A is wrong — holding shares in several companies is normal. Option C is wrong — there is no general upper age disqualification. Option B is wrong — disagreeing with a resolution is legitimate.

Question 9 · Syllabus ref F2a · The company secretary

Which statement about the company secretary is correct under the Companies Act 2006?

  1. Every company, public and private, must have a company secretary
  2. A public company must have a company secretary, but a private company need not appoint one
  3. A company secretary cannot bind the company in any administrative contract
  4. The company secretary sets the company's overall commercial strategy
Show answer and explanation

Answer: B. A public company must have a company secretary who meets the statutory qualification requirements, whereas a private company is not required to appoint one (though it may). Option A overstates the requirement for private companies. Option C is wrong — a secretary has ostensible authority to make contracts of an administrative nature (Panorama Developments). Option D is wrong — strategy is for the directors, not the secretary.

Question 10 · Syllabus ref F3a · Annual general meetings

Which statement about annual general meetings (AGMs) is correct?

  1. Public companies must hold an AGM each year, but private companies are not generally required to
  2. Every company must hold an AGM each year without exception
  3. No company is ever permitted to hold an AGM
  4. Only the company's auditors may call an AGM
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. A public company must hold an AGM each year within the statutory period, whereas a private company is not generally required to and can instead transact business by written resolution. Option B overstates the requirement, as it does not apply to most private companies. Option C is wrong — companies may hold general meetings. Option D is wrong — directors generally call meetings, with members able to require one in certain circumstances.

Question 11 · Syllabus ref F3b · Special resolutions

What majority is required to pass a special resolution of the members?

  1. A simple majority of more than 50% of votes cast
  2. A unanimous vote of all members
  3. A majority of at least 75% of votes cast
  4. Exactly two-thirds of the directors
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C. A special resolution requires a majority of at least 75% of the votes cast, and is needed for important decisions such as altering the articles, changing the company's name, or reducing capital. Option A describes an ordinary resolution. Option B is wrong — unanimity is not required. Option D is wrong — members' resolutions are passed by members' votes, not by a proportion of the directors.

Question 12 · Syllabus ref F3b · Written resolutions

Which statement about written resolutions under the Companies Act 2006 is correct?

  1. They are available to public companies only
  2. They can be used to remove a director or auditor before the end of their term
  3. They require the unanimous consent of the directors and the auditors
  4. They allow a private company's members to pass most resolutions without holding a meeting
Show answer and explanation

Answer: D. Written resolutions let the members of a private company pass most ordinary and special resolutions without convening a meeting, with the majority calculated by reference to total voting rights. Option A is wrong — the procedure is for private, not public, companies. Option C wrongly involves directors and auditors in the consent. Option B is wrong — the procedure cannot be used to remove a director or auditor before the end of their term.

Question 13 · Syllabus ref F3c · Notice of meetings

What is the general minimum period of notice required to call a general meeting of a private company (other than an adjourned meeting)?

  1. 48 hours
  2. 14 clear days
  3. 3 months
  4. No notice is required
Show answer and explanation

Answer: B. The default minimum notice for a general meeting of a private company is 14 clear days, though members holding the requisite majority may consent to short notice. Option A is far too short. Option C is far too long and is not the statutory period. Option D is wrong — notice is required so members can attend and vote, subject only to the short-notice consent provisions.

Question 14 · Syllabus ref F1d · Unfair prejudice petitions

On what basis may a member petition the court for relief under the unfair prejudice provisions of the Companies Act 2006?

  1. That the company's affairs are being, or have been, conducted in a manner unfairly prejudicial to the interests of members
  2. That the company has simply made a trading loss in the year
  3. That the member dislikes a fellow shareholder
  4. That the share price has fallen on the market
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. A member may petition where the company's affairs are being, or have been, conducted in a manner unfairly prejudicial to the interests of members generally or some part of them; the court has wide remedies, commonly ordering the purchase of the petitioner's shares. Option B is wrong — ordinary trading losses are not unfair prejudice. Options C and D describe matters that do not, of themselves, amount to unfairly prejudicial conduct.

Question 15 · Syllabus ref F1d · Derivative claims

What is a derivative claim under the Companies Act 2006?

  1. A claim brought by a creditor to wind up the company
  2. A claim brought by an employee against the company for unfair dismissal
  3. A claim brought by a member on behalf of the company in respect of a wrong done to the company, such as a breach of duty by a director
  4. A claim by the company against its own auditors only
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C. A derivative claim is brought by a member, on behalf of the company, in respect of a cause of action vested in the company arising from an actual or proposed act or omission involving negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust by a director; the court's permission to continue is required. Option A describes winding up. Option B is an employment claim. Option D wrongly limits it to claims against auditors.

Question 16 · Syllabus ref F1c · Board's powers of management

Under the model articles, in whom is the power to manage the company's business generally vested?

  1. The members in general meeting for all day-to-day decisions
  2. The company's bank
  3. The company secretary acting alone
  4. The directors, who may exercise all the powers of the company subject to the constitution and the Companies Act
Show answer and explanation

Answer: D. Under the typical model articles, the directors are responsible for managing the company and may exercise all its powers, subject to the constitution and the Act; members' control is generally exercised through resolutions and appointment/removal rather than day-to-day management. Option A is wrong — members do not run daily operations. Option C is wrong — the secretary lacks general management power. Option B is wrong — the bank is merely a service provider.

Question 17 · Syllabus ref F1d · Duty not to accept benefits from third parties

The directors' duty not to accept benefits from third parties is primarily concerned with preventing:

  1. Directors receiving their approved salary
  2. Directors being improperly influenced by bribes or secret benefits conferred because of their position
  3. Directors attending external training courses
  4. Directors lawfully owning shares in their own company
Show answer and explanation

Answer: B. This duty prohibits a director from accepting benefits from third parties conferred by reason of their office or of doing (or not doing) something as director, guarding against bribery and divided loyalty; it is not infringed if acceptance cannot reasonably be regarded as likely to give rise to a conflict. Option A is wrong — approved remuneration is legitimate. Options C and D describe ordinary, permissible activities, not prohibited third-party benefits.

Question 18 · Syllabus ref F1d · Duty to declare interest in a transaction

A director has a personal interest in a proposed contract with the company. What does the Companies Act 2006 primarily require of them?

  1. To declare the nature and extent of their interest to the other directors before the company enters into the transaction
  2. To resign from the board immediately
  3. To buy out and perform the contract personally instead
  4. To say nothing, provided the contract is profitable
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. A director must declare the nature and extent of any interest in a proposed transaction or arrangement with the company to the other directors before it is entered into, with a similar duty for existing transactions. Option B is wrong — declaration, not resignation, is required. Option C is irrelevant. Option D is wrong — non-disclosure is a breach regardless of whether the contract turns out profitable.

Question 19 · Syllabus ref F1b · Vacation of office

Which of the following would typically cause a person to cease to hold office as a director?

  1. Taking annual leave
  2. Disagreeing with another director
  3. Disqualification under a court order, resignation, or removal by the members
  4. Buying additional shares in the company
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C. A director ceases to hold office on events such as resignation, removal by the members, disqualification by court order, death, or where the articles provide (for example bankruptcy or long-term incapacity). Option A is wrong — leave does not end office. Option B is wrong — disagreement is part of normal governance. Option D is wrong — acquiring more shares does not affect a directorship.

Question 20 · Syllabus ref F3c · Quorum at meetings

What is meant by the 'quorum' for a company meeting?

  1. The maximum number of members allowed to attend
  2. The fee that members must pay in order to attend the meeting
  3. The number of resolutions that may be passed
  4. The minimum number of qualifying persons that must be present for the meeting to transact business validly
Show answer and explanation

Answer: D. The quorum is the minimum number of qualifying persons who must be present for a meeting to be properly constituted and able to transact business; for many companies the default is two, with a single-member company quorate with one. Option A reverses the concept. Option C confuses quorum with the agenda. Option B invents an attendance fee, which is not what quorum means.

Question 21 · Syllabus ref F1d · Ratification of directors' acts

Which statement about the members' ratification of conduct by a director amounting to a breach of duty is correct?

  1. No breach of duty can ever be ratified by the members in any circumstances
  2. Certain breaches may be ratified by ordinary resolution of the members, disregarding the votes of the director (if a member) and any connected members
  3. Ratification always requires a court order
  4. Ratification can be done only by the auditors
Show answer and explanation

Answer: B. Conduct by a director amounting to negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust may be ratified by the members by ordinary resolution, but the votes of the director (where also a member) and any member connected with them are disregarded. Option A is too absolute — many breaches can be ratified. Option C is wrong — no court order is needed. Option D is wrong — ratification is a members', not an auditors', function.

Question 22 · Syllabus ref F2a · Duties of the company secretary

Which of the following is typically a duty of a company secretary?

  1. Maintaining statutory registers and ensuring compliance with filing requirements
  2. Setting the company's product pricing strategy
  3. Guaranteeing the company's debts personally
  4. Appointing the external auditors without member involvement
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. The company secretary's role is administrative and compliance-focused: maintaining the statutory registers, arranging meetings and minutes, and ensuring documents are filed at Companies House on time. Option B is a commercial matter for the directors. Option C is wrong — a secretary does not personally guarantee company debts. Option D is wrong — auditor appointment generally involves the members, not the secretary acting alone.

Other LW topics

Advertisement