LW: Capital and financing
18 free practice questions on capital and financing, Section E of the ACCA Corporate and Business Law (LW: English) (LW) question bank. Topics include Ordinary versus preference shares, Nature of a share, Allotment of shares, Class rights, Maintenance of capital, Dividends. Each question carries its syllabus reference and a worked explanation. Practise them in the quiz with instant feedback, or read every question with its answer further down this page.
→ Full LW question bank and timed mock exam
→ LW Common Mistakes
Loading questions…
All 18 capital and financing questions
The same questions the quiz above draws on, in syllabus order, each with its answer and worked explanation. All 18 are multiple choice.
Which of the following is a typical feature of a preference share compared with an ordinary share?
- It usually carries a right to a fixed dividend, paid in priority to ordinary dividends
- It always carries enhanced voting rights at general meetings
- It ranks last on a winding up, after the ordinary shareholders
- It can never receive any dividend
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. A preference share typically carries the right to a fixed dividend paid in priority to ordinary dividends, and usually priority on a return of capital, but normally limited or no voting rights. Option B is wrong — preference shares usually have restricted voting rights. Option C is wrong — they generally rank ahead of, not behind, ordinary shares on a winding up. Option D is wrong — they receive their fixed dividend when profits allow.
Which statement best describes the nature of a share in a company?
- It is a loan made to the company that must be repaid with interest
- It gives the holder direct ownership of the company's individual assets
- It is a guarantee that the holder will receive a dividend every year
- It represents the holder's ownership interest in the company, measured by a sum of money and carrying rights and obligations
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. A share represents a member's proportionate interest in the company, defined as a sum of money for liability and dividend purposes, and carrying rights (such as voting and dividends) and obligations set by the articles. Option A describes a loan or debenture, not a share. Option C is wrong — dividends are not guaranteed. Option B is wrong — shareholders own shares, not the company's underlying assets, which belong to the company.
What is meant by the 'allotment' of shares?
- The cancellation and extinguishing of existing issued shares
- The process by which a person acquires the unconditional right to be entered in the register of members for new shares
- The payment of a dividend to existing shareholders
- The transfer of shares between two existing shareholders
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Allotment is the process of creating and issuing new shares, under which a person acquires the unconditional right to be entered in the register of members in respect of those shares. Option A describes a reduction/cancellation, the opposite of allotment. Option C concerns dividends, not share issue. Option D describes a transfer of existing shares between holders, which is different from an allotment of new shares.
What are 'class rights' in relation to a company's shares?
- The rights of creditors to be paid before shareholders
- The right of directors to set their own salaries
- Special rights attached to a particular class of shares, such as dividend, voting or capital rights
- The right of the public to inspect the share register
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Class rights are the rights attached to a particular class of shares — for example, special dividend, voting or capital entitlements — and they can generally be varied only by following the statutory or constitutional variation procedure, protecting that class. Option A concerns creditors, not share classes. Option B concerns directors' remuneration. Option D concerns inspection rights, none of which are class rights.
What is the purpose of the 'maintenance of capital' doctrine in company law?
- To ensure shareholders receive the highest possible dividend
- To guarantee that the company's share price remains stable
- To require companies to keep all their cash in a bank account
- To protect creditors by preventing a company from returning capital to its members except by permitted procedures
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. The maintenance of capital doctrine protects creditors: a company's share capital is regarded as a fund available to meet debts, so it generally may not be returned to members except by recognised procedures (such as a lawful reduction of capital). Option A is wrong — the doctrine restricts, not maximises, distributions. Option C invents a cash-holding rule. Option B is wrong — it does not concern market share prices.
From what may a company lawfully pay a dividend?
- From its share capital
- From accumulated, realised profits available for the purpose (distributable profits)
- From money borrowed specifically to fund the dividend
- From any cash in the bank, regardless of profits
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. A dividend may lawfully be paid only out of profits available for distribution — broadly, accumulated realised profits less accumulated realised losses. Option A is wrong — paying a dividend out of share capital breaches the maintenance-of-capital rules. Option C is wrong — borrowing does not create distributable profits. Option D is wrong — the availability of cash is not the legal test; distributable profits must exist.
How may a private company limited by shares reduce its share capital under the Companies Act 2006?
- By a simple decision of the board with no further steps
- Only by an order of the criminal courts
- By special resolution supported by a solvency statement from the directors
- It can never reduce its share capital in any circumstances
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. A private company may reduce its capital by special resolution supported by a solvency statement made by the directors, providing a creditor-protective alternative to the court-approved route. Option A is wrong — a mere board decision is insufficient. Option B is wrong — the criminal courts are not involved. Option D is wrong — reduction is permitted where the proper procedure (and creditor protection) is followed.
Which statement best describes a debenture?
- A document evidencing a company's borrowing, where the holder is a creditor of the company
- A certificate showing ownership of shares in the company
- A type of dividend paid to preference shareholders
- A document transferring land to the company
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. A debenture is a document that acknowledges or creates a debt owed by the company; the debenture holder is a creditor, typically entitled to interest and repayment, and often secured by a charge. Option B describes a share certificate — shareholders are members, not creditors. Option C confuses debentures with dividends. Option D is wrong — a debenture concerns borrowing, not the conveyance of land.
Which of the following best describes a floating charge?
- A charge over a specific, identified asset that the company cannot deal with freely
- A charge that ranks ahead of all fixed charges in every case
- A type of charge that can never be registered at Companies House
- A charge over a class of assets, present and future, which the company may deal with in the ordinary course until the charge crystallises
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. A floating charge is taken over a fluctuating class of assets (such as stock or receivables), present and future, leaving the company free to deal with them in the ordinary course of business until the charge crystallises into a fixed charge on a specified event. Option A describes a fixed charge. Option C is wrong — charges must generally be registered. Option B is wrong — fixed charges generally rank ahead of floating charges over the same assets.
What is the consequence if a registrable charge created by a company is not registered at Companies House within the required period?
- The charge is enhanced and gains extra priority
- The charge is void against a liquidator, administrator and other creditors, though the debt itself remains payable
- Nothing happens; registration is purely optional
- The whole of the underlying loan is automatically cancelled and written off
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. A registrable charge that is not delivered for registration within the statutory period (generally 21 days) is void against a liquidator, administrator and the company's creditors, although the underlying debt remains due and immediately repayable. Option A is the opposite of the effect. Option C is wrong — registration is not optional for registrable charges. Option D is wrong — the loan itself is not cancelled, only the security is lost against those parties.
When shares are issued at a price above their nominal value, how must the excess be treated?
- It is recorded as a trading profit available for dividends
- It is repaid immediately to the directors
- It must be credited to a share premium account, the use of which is restricted
- It is ignored in the company's accounts
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Where shares are issued at a premium (above nominal value), the excess must be credited to a share premium account, which is a capital reserve whose use is restricted by statute (for example, it cannot generally be used to pay ordinary dividends). Option A is wrong — premium is not a distributable trading profit. Option B is wrong — it is not paid to directors. Option D is wrong — the premium must be properly recorded.
What is the general rule about a company acquiring its own shares?
- A company may freely buy its own shares at any time without restriction
- Only public companies are ever allowed to buy their own shares
- A company must buy back all its shares every year
- A company generally may not acquire its own shares, except where statute permits and the prescribed procedure is followed
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. The general rule is that a limited company may not acquire its own shares, reflecting capital maintenance; statute provides exceptions, such as a properly conducted purchase of own shares following the prescribed procedure. Option A is wrong — acquisition is restricted, not free. Option C invents a mandatory annual buy-back. Option B is wrong — private companies can also buy back shares, indeed with additional flexibility to do so out of capital.
Which statement about the transfer of shares in a private company is generally correct?
- Shares can never be transferred in a private company
- A transfer is complete the moment the parties shake hands
- Transfers require the approval of Companies House before they take effect
- The articles may lawfully restrict the transfer of shares, for example by giving directors power to refuse to register a transfer
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. Private company articles commonly restrict share transfers — for instance, by giving the directors a discretion to refuse to register a transfer, or by pre-emption rights for existing members. Option A is wrong — shares can be transferred, subject to such restrictions. Option C is wrong — Companies House does not pre-approve individual transfers. Option B is wrong — legal title passes only when the transferee is registered in the register of members.
The general prohibition on a public company giving financial assistance for the purchase of its own shares is designed mainly to:
- Increase the company's share price
- Protect the company's capital and its creditors and shareholders from the risks of such arrangements
- Guarantee that the directors receive an annual bonus
- Ensure dividends are always paid in cash
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. The restriction on a public company giving financial assistance for the acquisition of its own shares supports capital maintenance, protecting the company's capital base and, in turn, its creditors and remaining shareholders from the risks of such schemes. Option A is wrong — it is not a price-support measure. Options C and D are unrelated to the purpose of the rule, which is creditor and capital protection.
Which of the following correctly distinguishes a debenture holder from a shareholder?
- A debenture holder is a creditor entitled to interest, whereas a shareholder is a member with an ownership stake
- A debenture holder owns part of the company, whereas a shareholder is a lender
- A debenture holder always has voting rights at general meetings
- Both rank equally on a winding up in every case
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. A debenture holder is a creditor of the company, entitled to interest and repayment and ranking ahead of members on a winding up, whereas a shareholder is a member with an ownership interest who shares in profits via dividends. Option B reverses the two. Option C is wrong — debenture holders do not have membership voting rights. Option D is wrong — secured creditors generally rank ahead of shareholders on a winding up.
A dividend is paid when the company has no distributable profits. What is the position of a shareholder who knew, or had reasonable grounds to know, this?
- The shareholder may keep the dividend in all circumstances
- Only the auditors are liable, never the shareholder
- The dividend automatically becomes a loan repayable in ten years
- The shareholder may be required to repay the unlawful distribution to the company
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. A distribution made otherwise than out of distributable profits is unlawful; a member who knew or had reasonable grounds to believe it was unlawful may be required to repay it to the company. Option A is wrong where the member had the relevant knowledge. Option C invents a non-existent rule converting it to a loan. Option B wrongly excludes the recipient shareholder; directors who authorised it may also be liable.
Which event would cause a floating charge to crystallise?
- The company paying a routine supplier invoice
- The company selling stock in the ordinary course of business
- The company going into liquidation or ceasing to carry on business
- The company hiring a new employee
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. A floating charge crystallises — becoming a fixed charge over the assets then in the relevant class — on events such as the company going into liquidation, ceasing to carry on business, the appointment of a receiver, or any crystallising event specified in the charge. Options A, B and D are ordinary-course dealings the company remains free to undertake precisely because the charge is still floating, not crystallised.
What is the general effect of statutory pre-emption rights when a company proposes to allot new ordinary shares for cash?
- The shares must first be offered to the company's creditors
- The new shares must first be offered to existing ordinary shareholders in proportion to their holdings
- The shares must be sold to the public at large
- The directors may allot them to themselves without restriction
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Statutory pre-emption rights generally require new equity shares allotted for cash to be offered first to existing ordinary shareholders, pro rata to their holdings, so their proportionate stake is not diluted; these rights can be disapplied by the appropriate resolution. Option A is wrong — creditors have no pre-emption right. Option C ignores existing members' priority. Option D is wrong — directors cannot bypass pre-emption rights to allot to themselves.
Other LW topics
- Legal system (12 questions)
- Obligations (contract and tort) (34 questions)
- Employment (16 questions)
- Business organisations (24 questions)
- Management and administration (22 questions)
- Fraud and criminal behaviour (15 questions)
- All LW sections, with the timed mock exam
- Spotted a mistake? Report it and it will be corrected.