FM: Business finance
28 free practice questions on business finance, Section E of the ACCA Financial Management (FM) question bank. Topics include Rights issue, CAPM, WACC, Features of equity finance, Features of debt finance, Convertible debt. Each question carries its syllabus reference and a worked explanation. Practise them in the quiz with instant feedback, or read every question with its answer further down this page.
→ Full FM question bank and timed mock exam
→ FM Common Mistakes
→ FM Formula Sheet
Loading questions…
All 28 business finance questions
The same questions the quiz above draws on, in syllabus order, each with its answer and worked explanation. 19 are multiple choice and 9 are numerical, where you work the answer out before choosing it.
Which of the following is a feature of ordinary (equity) share finance?
- Ordinary shareholders receive a fixed dividend ahead of all other claims
- Ordinary shareholders bear the greatest risk and rank last on a winding up, but hold voting control and the right to residual profits
- Ordinary shares must be redeemed by the company on a fixed future date, like a bond
- Dividends on ordinary shares are a tax-deductible expense for the company
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Ordinary shareholders are the owners of the company: they rank last in a winding up and their dividends are discretionary, so they bear the most risk, but in return they hold voting rights and are entitled to the residual profits after all prior claims. Option A describes preference shares, option C is wrong because ordinary shares are normally irredeemable, and option D is false — dividends are an appropriation of profit, not a tax-deductible expense like debt interest.
Compared with equity finance, debt finance (such as bonds or bank loans) typically:
- Carries a higher required return than equity for the same company
- Gives the lender voting control over the company
- Is cheaper, because interest is tax-deductible and lenders bear less risk than shareholders
- Never has to be repaid by the company under any circumstances
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Debt is generally cheaper than equity for the same company because lenders bear less risk (ranking ahead of shareholders and often holding security) and because interest is tax-deductible, creating a 'tax shield'. Option A is the wrong way round (debt's required return is lower than equity's), option B is untrue (lenders do not normally have voting control), and option D is false — debt usually carries a repayment obligation and interest must be paid regardless of profits.
A company makes a rights issue of one new share for every four shares held, at a price of £4.00. The cum-rights market price is £5.00 per share. What is the theoretical ex-rights price (TERP)?
- £5.00
- £4.00
- £4.50
- £4.80
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. TERP = (value of the existing shares + proceeds of the new share) ÷ the total number of shares after the issue. For four shares at £5.00 plus one new share at £4.00: (4 × £5.00 + 1 × £4.00) ÷ 5 = £24.00 ÷ 5 = £4.80. The ex-rights price settles between the old market price and the issue price. Option A ignores the dilution, option B is the issue price, and option C is a simple average that ignores the 4:1 weighting of old to new shares.
A rights issue has a theoretical ex-rights price of £4.80 and an issue price of £4.00. What is the value of a right (per new share)?
- £0.80
- £1.00
- £0.20
- £4.80
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. The value of a right per new share = theoretical ex-rights price − issue price = £4.80 − £4.00 = £0.80. This is the value attaching to the right to subscribe for one new share at the discounted price; a shareholder who does not wish to take up the offer can sell the rights for approximately this amount, leaving their wealth unchanged in theory. Option B and option C use incorrect bases, and option D simply restates the ex-rights price.
A convertible bond gives the holder the right to:
- Demand immediate repayment of the bond in cash at any time before maturity
- Convert the bond into a predetermined number of ordinary shares at a future date, instead of receiving cash redemption
- Receive a rate of interest that varies with the company's profits
- Vote at the annual general meeting while still holding the bond
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. A convertible bond is debt that the holder may, at a specified future date, choose to convert into a set number of ordinary shares rather than redeem for cash. The conversion option usually lets the company pay a lower coupon, and conversion (if it occurs) avoids the cash outflow of redemption. Option A misstates the redemption terms, option C describes a different instrument, and option D is wrong — bondholders do not vote unless and until they convert into shares.
In Islamic finance, which arrangement is closest in nature to equity finance, with profits and losses shared between the partners?
- Murabaha (a cost-plus or mark-up sale, similar to trade credit)
- Ijara (an arrangement similar to leasing)
- Musharaka (a partnership in which profits and losses are shared)
- Sukuk treated purely as a fixed-return instrument
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Musharaka is a partnership in which the parties contribute capital, share profits in agreed proportions and share losses in proportion to capital, making it the closest equivalent to equity finance. Murabaha (option A) is a cost-plus sale resembling trade credit, ijara (option B) is akin to leasing, and sukuk are asset-backed certificates that behave more like bonds. FM requires knowledge of the nature of these products rather than calculations, and the examiner has noted candidates confusing the terms.
Which statement best contrasts a bank overdraft with a bank term loan?
- An overdraft is always cheaper than a term loan
- A term loan is repayable on demand, whereas an overdraft has a fixed repayment schedule
- Both are identical forms of long-term finance
- An overdraft is a flexible, repayable-on-demand facility for short-term needs; a term loan provides a fixed sum repaid over an agreed longer-term period
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. An overdraft is a flexible facility, usually repayable on demand and intended for short-term, fluctuating working-capital needs, with interest charged only on the amount drawn. A term loan provides a fixed sum for a set period with a scheduled repayment profile, suited to longer-term financing. Option A is not always true, option B reverses the two facilities, and option C wrongly treats them as identical long-term finance.
Venture capital is most accurately described as:
- Equity-type finance provided to higher-risk, often unlisted, growth companies, in return for a significant equity stake
- A government grant that never has to be repaid
- A short-term bank overdraft facility
- A risk-free government bond
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. Venture capital is medium- to long-term equity or quasi-equity finance provided to higher-risk companies — often young, unlisted firms with high growth potential — typically in exchange for a substantial equity stake and some influence over the business, with the investor aiming to exit at a profit after several years. Option B describes a grant, option C a short-term facility and option D a risk-free instrument, none of which captures the nature of venture capital.
The dividend valuation model expresses the cost of equity as being driven by:
- The nominal (par) value of the company's shares only
- The company's reported accounting profit for the most recent year
- The expected future dividends and the current share price (plus the expected dividend growth rate, where relevant)
- The number of directors on the company's board
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. The dividend valuation model holds that the value of a share is the present value of its expected future dividends; rearranged, the cost of equity equals the dividend yield plus the expected dividend growth rate (Ke = D1/P0 + g). It therefore depends on expected future dividends, the current share price and the growth rate. Option A uses an irrelevant nominal value, option B uses accounting profit instead of dividends and price, and option D is irrelevant to the model.
A company has just paid a dividend of 20p per share. Dividends are expected to grow at 5% per year in perpetuity, and the ex-dividend share price is £3.00. Using the dividend growth model, what is the cost of equity?
- 12.0%
- 11.7%
- 7.0%
- 6.7%
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. Cost of equity Ke = D1 ÷ P0 + g, where D1 is next year's dividend = 20p × 1.05 = 21p. Ke = 21 ÷ 300 + 0.05 = 0.07 + 0.05 = 0.12 = 12.0%. Option C (7.0%) is the dividend yield alone, forgetting to add growth. Option B (11.7%) uses this year's dividend D0 (20p) instead of next year's D1. Option D (6.7%) is the yield on D0 only. The model adds the dividend yield and the growth rate to give the total return required by shareholders.
A company retains 40% of its earnings and earns a return of 15% on reinvested funds. Using the earnings-retention (Gordon's growth) model, what is the expected dividend growth rate?
- 15%
- 6%
- 40%
- 55%
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Under Gordon's growth model, g = retention ratio × return on reinvested funds = 0.40 × 0.15 = 0.06 = 6%. Growth is generated by reinvesting retained profits at the rate of return the company earns on them. Option A is the return on reinvestment alone, option C is the retention ratio alone, and option D simply adds the two figures. The retained proportion and the return earned on it together drive sustainable dividend growth.
The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) determines the return required by investors based on:
- The total risk (both systematic and unsystematic) of a share
- The company's reported accounting profit
- The systematic (market) risk of a share, measured by its beta factor
- The dividend growth rate alone
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. CAPM holds that investors require a return only for systematic (market) risk, because unsystematic (company-specific) risk can be diversified away in a well-spread portfolio. The required return = risk-free rate + beta × equity risk premium, where beta measures the share's sensitivity to overall market movements. Option A wrongly includes diversifiable risk, option B uses accounting profit, and option D describes the dividend growth model rather than CAPM.
The risk-free rate is 4%, the expected return on the market is 10%, and a company's equity beta is 1.3. Using CAPM, what is its cost of equity?
- 13.0%
- 10.0%
- 17.8%
- 11.8%
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. CAPM: Ke = Rf + β × (Rm − Rf) = 4% + 1.3 × (10% − 4%) = 4% + 1.3 × 6% = 4% + 7.8% = 11.8%. Option A multiplies beta by the whole market return (1.3 × 10%), option C adds the full market return to the premium, and option B is simply the market return. The term (Rm − Rf) is the equity risk premium, scaled by beta to reflect the share's systematic risk.
Which statement about systematic and unsystematic risk is correct?
- Unsystematic (specific) risk can be diversified away by holding a well-diversified portfolio, whereas systematic (market) risk cannot
- Systematic risk can be eliminated by diversification, but unsystematic risk cannot
- Both types of risk can be completely eliminated by diversification
- Neither systematic nor unsystematic risk can be reduced by diversification
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. Unsystematic (company- or industry-specific) risk can be largely eliminated by holding a diversified portfolio, because specific good and bad events tend to offset one another. Systematic (market) risk affects all investments and cannot be diversified away, which is why CAPM rewards only systematic risk through beta. Option B reverses the two, and options C and D both misstate what diversification can achieve.
A company has irredeemable bonds with an 8% coupon (interest of £8 per £100 nominal) trading at £80 per £100 nominal. The corporation tax rate is 30%. What is the after-tax cost of this debt?
- 8.0%
- 7.0%
- 10.0%
- 5.6%
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. For irredeemable debt, after-tax cost = interest × (1 − tax rate) ÷ market value = £8 × (1 − 0.30) ÷ £80 = £5.60 ÷ £80 = 7.0%. Option C ignores tax (£8 ÷ £80 = 10%), option A uses the coupon rate against nominal value, and option D expresses the after-tax interest as a percentage of nominal value rather than market value. The market value, not the nominal value, must be used as the denominator.
How is the cost of redeemable debt normally calculated?
- As the coupon rate applied to the nominal value
- By dividing the annual interest by the nominal value
- As the internal rate of return of the after-tax cash flows — market value now, after-tax interest each year, and redemption at maturity
- As the dividend yield on the bonds
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. The cost of redeemable debt is the internal rate of return (yield to maturity) that equates the current market value with the present value of the future after-tax interest payments and the redemption amount. It is found by interpolation between two trial discount rates, just like a project IRR. Options A and B ignore the time value of money and any redemption gain or loss, and option D wrongly applies a dividend concept to debt.
A company has 6% preference shares with a nominal value of £1 each, currently trading at 75p. What is the cost of this preference share capital?
- 6.0%
- 4.2%
- 4.5%
- 8.0%
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. Cost of preference shares = annual preference dividend ÷ market value = 6p ÷ 75p = 8.0%. The 6% rate applies to the £1 nominal value to give a 6p dividend, but the yield is measured against the 75p market price. Preference dividends are not tax-deductible, so — unlike debt interest — there is no tax adjustment. Option A uses the nominal value as the denominator, and options B and C apply incorrect adjustments.
A company is financed by equity with a market value of £6 million and a cost of 12%, and by debt with a market value of £4 million and an after-tax cost of 7%. What is its weighted average cost of capital (WACC)?
- 10.0%
- 9.5%
- 10.5%
- 19.0%
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. WACC = (proportion of equity × cost of equity) + (proportion of debt × after-tax cost of debt). Total value = £10m, so the equity weight is 0.6 and the debt weight is 0.4. WACC = (0.6 × 12%) + (0.4 × 7%) = 7.2% + 2.8% = 10.0%. Option D simply adds the two costs, and options B and C come from incorrect weightings such as book values or equal weights. Market values must be used for the weights.
When calculating the WACC, why should the market values of equity and debt be used as the weights rather than their book values?
- Book values are easier to find, so they are preferred
- Market values reflect the current opportunity cost of the finance to investors, giving a more accurate cost of capital
- Market values are always lower than book values
- It makes no difference which is used, since both give the same WACC
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Market values are used because they reflect what investors could earn elsewhere — the true opportunity cost of the funds — and therefore give a more realistic cost of capital. Equity market value often differs greatly from book value, so book-value weights can materially distort the WACC. Option A puts convenience above accuracy, option C is not generally true, and option D is wrong because the choice can change the WACC significantly. The examiner regularly penalises the use of book-value weightings.
Using the existing WACC as the discount rate for a new project is only appropriate when:
- The project is much larger than the existing business
- The project is financed entirely by newly issued equity capital
- The project has similar business risk to existing operations and does not significantly change the company's gearing (financial risk)
- The project carries a higher risk than existing operations
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. The existing WACC is a valid discount rate only if the new project has broadly the same business risk as current activities and is financed so that the capital structure — and therefore financial risk — is left broadly unchanged. If either business or financial risk differs materially, a project-specific rate (for example one derived through a CAPM-based approach) is needed instead. Options A, B and D all describe situations where the existing WACC would not be appropriate.
What is the difference between an asset (ungeared) beta and an equity (geared) beta?
- They are always exactly equal to each other in every company
- The asset beta reflects only financial risk, while the equity beta reflects only business risk
- The equity beta is always lower than the asset beta
- The asset beta reflects business risk only, while the equity beta reflects both business risk and the financial risk added by gearing
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. An asset (ungeared) beta reflects the systematic business risk of a company's operations as though it had no debt. An equity (geared) beta reflects both that business risk and the extra financial risk created by gearing, so for a geared company the equity beta exceeds the asset beta. This is why, when appraising a project of a different risk class, a proxy company's asset beta is regeared to the appraising company's own capital structure. Options A, B and C all misstate the relationship.
Why is debt finance normally cheaper than equity finance for the same company?
- Lenders bear less risk than shareholders (ranking higher and often holding security) and debt interest is tax-deductible
- Because debt holders receive dividends rather than interest
- Because equity finance never has to be repaid at any point
- Because debt always carries voting rights
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. Debt is cheaper because lenders take less risk than shareholders — they rank ahead on a winding up, often hold security, and receive contractual interest — so they require a lower return; in addition, interest is tax-deductible, lowering the effective cost further through the tax shield. Option B is wrong (debt holders receive interest, not dividends), option C is irrelevant to the cost comparison, and option D is untrue, as debt does not normally carry voting rights.
Which of the following is a relevant factor when a company chooses between debt and equity finance?
- Whether the finance can be arranged before the end of the current accounting period
- The level of financial risk (gearing) the company will accept, the availability of security, and matching the finance to the life of the asset
- The number of employees in the finance department
- The personal preferences of individual customers
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. The choice of finance depends on matters such as the level of gearing and financial risk the company and its shareholders will accept, the availability of security for borrowing, the maturity of the finance relative to the asset being funded, the relative cost of each source, and the wish to retain control. Option B captures several of these considerations, whereas options A, C and D list factors that are irrelevant to the financing decision.
According to the traditional view of capital structure, what happens to the WACC as a company first introduces debt into an all-equity structure?
- The WACC rises immediately and continues to rise with every pound of new debt
- The WACC is completely unaffected by gearing
- The WACC falls at first, reaches a minimum at an optimal level of gearing, then rises as financial risk becomes significant
- The WACC falls continuously towards zero as more debt is added
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. The traditional view holds that, as cheaper debt is first introduced, the WACC falls; but beyond a point the rising financial risk pushes up the cost of equity (and eventually the cost of debt), so the WACC reaches a minimum at an optimal gearing level and then rises. This implies an optimal capital structure exists. Options A and D misstate the pattern, and option B describes the Modigliani-Miller no-tax view rather than the traditional one.
Under Modigliani and Miller's theory without taxes, what is the effect of gearing on the WACC?
- The WACC falls continuously and without limit as gearing increases
- The WACC rises continuously as gearing increases
- There is an optimal gearing level that minimises the WACC
- The WACC remains constant, because the benefit of cheaper debt is exactly offset by the rising cost of equity
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. In Modigliani and Miller's world without taxes, the WACC is constant whatever the level of gearing: as cheaper debt is added, the cost of equity rises by exactly enough to offset the benefit, so total company value is unaffected by capital structure. Option C describes the traditional view, while options A and B describe continuous movements the no-tax model does not predict. The conclusion changes once corporate tax is introduced.
Under Modigliani and Miller's theory with corporate taxes, what is the effect of increasing gearing?
- The WACC falls as gearing increases, because the tax shield on debt interest adds value — implying very high gearing is optimal in the basic model
- The WACC is unaffected by gearing
- The WACC rises continuously, making debt undesirable
- Gearing has no effect on the value of the company
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. Once corporate tax is introduced, debt interest is tax-deductible, so the tax shield adds value as gearing rises and the WACC falls. Taken to its logical conclusion, the basic model implies a company should be financed almost entirely by debt. In practice this is tempered by bankruptcy and agency costs, which the basic model ignores. Option B describes the no-tax case, and options C and D contradict the tax-shield benefit.
A company has profit before interest and tax (PBIT) of £600,000 and annual interest payable of £150,000. What is its interest cover?
- 2.5 times
- 4.0 times
- 0.25 times
- 25%
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Interest cover = profit before interest and tax ÷ interest payable = £600,000 ÷ £150,000 = 4.0 times. This shows how many times operating profit covers the interest commitment; a higher figure means a greater safety margin and lower financial risk. Option C inverts the ratio, option D expresses that inverse as a percentage, and option A does not follow from the figures. Lenders watch interest cover closely as an indicator of default risk.
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) often face a 'funding gap'. This refers to the difficulty that:
- SMEs have too much surplus cash and cannot find ways to invest it
- SMEs are legally barred from borrowing money
- SMEs can struggle to obtain finance because they are seen as higher risk, have less security and are too small for public capital markets — a gap between what they need and what is available
- SMEs must always be financed entirely by government grants
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. The funding gap describes SMEs' difficulty in raising finance: they are often viewed as higher risk, can offer less security, have limited track records and are usually too small to access public equity or bond markets economically, so a gap arises between the finance they need and what lenders and investors will readily provide. It is addressed through sources such as business angels, venture capital, crowdfunding and supply-chain finance. Options A, B and D are incorrect.
Other FM topics
- Financial management function and objectives (18 questions)
- Economic environment (15 questions)
- Working capital (28 questions)
- Investment appraisal (30 questions)
- Business valuations (18 questions)
- Risk management (13 questions)
- All FM sections, with the timed mock exam
- Spotted a mistake? Report it and it will be corrected.