← AA: all sections
ACCA · Applied Skills

AA: Planning and risk

28 free practice questions on planning and risk, Section B of the ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA) question bank. Topics include Materiality, Audit documentation, Acceptance of audit engagements, Preconditions for audit, Obtaining an audit engagement, Engagement letters. Each question carries its syllabus reference and a worked explanation. Practise them in the quiz with instant feedback, or read every question with its answer further down this page.

→ Full AA question bank and timed mock exam
→ AA Common Mistakes

Explanations shown after each answer. Skip freely. No time limit.
Section:
0
answered
0
correct
—
score
—
remaining
Question 1

Loading questions…

All 28 planning and risk questions

The same questions the quiz above draws on, in syllabus order, each with its answer and worked explanation. All 28 are multiple choice.

Question 1 · Syllabus ref B1a · Acceptance of audit engagements

Greenfield & Co is considering accepting appointment as auditor of Ravenstone Ltd. The previous auditor resigned without completing the audit. What is the most important first action?

  1. Contact the previous auditor to enquire whether there are any professional reasons why the appointment should not be accepted
  2. Agree the audit fee with Ravenstone Ltd's board
  3. Issue the engagement letter immediately to establish the contractual relationship
  4. Review Ravenstone Ltd's financial statements from the previous three years
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. Before accepting appointment, the incoming auditor must contact the outgoing auditor to ask whether there are any professional reasons why the appointment should not be accepted — option A. The outgoing auditor may be aware of management integrity issues, disagreements over accounting treatments, or suspicions of fraud that would be relevant to the incoming auditor's acceptance decision. Option B (agreeing the fee) comes later. Option C (issuing the letter) is premature before the acceptance decision is finalised. Option D (reviewing prior statements) is useful but not the most important first step.

Question 2 · Syllabus ref B1b · Preconditions for audit

Before accepting a new audit engagement, an auditor must determine that preconditions for an audit are present. Which of the following is a precondition under ISA 210?

  1. Management acknowledges its responsibility for preparing financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework and for designing internal controls
  2. The client must have used the same accounting policies for at least three consecutive years
  3. The client must have no outstanding legal proceedings
  4. The client must be listed on a recognised stock exchange
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. A key precondition under ISA 210 is that management acknowledges its responsibilities — option A. Management must accept responsibility for: preparing the financial statements in accordance with the applicable framework; the design, implementation and maintenance of internal controls; and providing the auditor with access to all relevant information. If management does not accept these responsibilities, the auditor cannot accept the engagement. Options B, C and D are not preconditions under ISA 210.

Question 3 · Syllabus ref B1c · Obtaining an audit engagement

A company invites audit firms to tender for its audit. Which describes the typical process by which an audit firm obtains the engagement?

  1. The company sends a request for proposal to interested firms; firms submit tenders; the audit committee evaluates and recommends the preferred firm; shareholders approve the appointment at the AGM
  2. The existing auditor automatically retains the engagement without any formal process
  3. The audit firm applies directly to the relevant professional body for appointment
  4. The company's directors select the auditor without any shareholder involvement
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. The audit appointment process typically involves a formal tender, audit committee evaluation, and shareholder approval at the AGM — option A. The audit committee, composed of independent NEDs, evaluates tender submissions and recommends the preferred firm to the board and shareholders. Shareholders formally appoint (and can remove) the auditor. Option B is incorrect — a formal process typically exists. Option C is incorrect — professional bodies accredit auditors but do not appoint them to specific clients. Option D is incorrect — shareholder approval is required under company law in most jurisdictions.

Question 4 · Syllabus ref B1d · Engagement letters

Which of the following is the primary purpose of an engagement letter?

  1. To define the terms of the audit engagement and reduce the risk of misunderstandings about the respective responsibilities of the auditor and management
  2. To confirm the audit fee agreed between the auditor and the client
  3. To satisfy regulatory requirements imposed by the relevant professional body
  4. To document the auditor's preliminary risk assessment before planning commences
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. The primary purpose of an engagement letter is to define the terms of the engagement and reduce the risk of misunderstandings about the objectives and scope of the audit, the respective responsibilities of the auditor and management, and the form of any reports — option A. While the fee is often included alongside the engagement letter (option B), this is not its primary purpose. Regulatory compliance (option C) and risk assessment (option D) are separate matters.

Question 5 · Syllabus ref B1a · Continuance of audit engagements

An audit firm is considering whether to continue as auditor of an existing client. During the year, the audit team had serious disagreements with management over the accounting treatment of a material transaction, and management overrode the team's recommendations. What is the most appropriate action?

  1. Evaluate whether the disagreements and management override indicate management integrity issues; if so, this may be grounds to withdraw from the engagement, having complied with professional and legal requirements for resignation
  2. Continue as auditor without further consideration — the client always has the right to override the auditor
  3. Immediately resign without any documentation or explanation
  4. Agree with management's position to maintain the commercial relationship
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. Continuance decisions require evaluation of integrity and independence — option A. When management overrides audit recommendations on significant accounting treatments, the firm must consider whether this reflects a legitimate difference of professional opinion or evidence of management's willingness to present financial information misleadingly. If the latter, the firm may need to withdraw, following professional requirements for resignation. Option B ignores the professional obligation to consider continuance. Option C fails professional requirements. Option D compromises independence.

Question 6 · Syllabus ref B2a · Overall objectives of the auditor

ISA 200 sets out the overall objectives of the auditor. Which correctly states these?

  1. To obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to report on the financial statements in accordance with the auditor's findings
  2. To obtain absolute assurance about whether the financial statements are free from all misstatements and to express an opinion
  3. To detect all instances of fraud and report them to the appropriate regulatory authorities
  4. To certify that the financial statements comply with all applicable tax legislation
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. ISA 200 states the auditor's objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement (whether due to fraud or error) and to report in accordance with ISA findings — option A. Key qualifiers are 'reasonable' (not absolute) assurance and 'material' misstatement (not all errors). Option B incorrectly states 'absolute assurance' and 'all misstatements'. Option C incorrectly makes fraud detection the primary objective. Option D incorrectly refers to tax legislation compliance.

Question 7 · Syllabus ref B2b · Professional scepticism

During an audit, an auditor receives a management explanation for an unusual journal entry that seems plausible. Which best describes the appropriate application of professional scepticism?

  1. Accept the explanation at face value since it is plausible
  2. Reject the explanation and qualify the audit report
  3. Critically assess the explanation and seek corroborating evidence before accepting it
  4. Document the explanation in the working papers and take no further action
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C. Professional scepticism requires a questioning mind and critical assessment of audit evidence — option C. An auditor exercising professional scepticism does not simply accept management explanations because they are plausible; they seek corroborating evidence to support or contradict the explanation. Option A describes a lack of scepticism. Option B goes too far — a plausible explanation is not grounds for immediate qualification. Option D documents the explanation but fails to evaluate it, which also falls short of the required standard.

Question 8 · Syllabus ref B3a · Components of audit risk

An entity operates in a highly regulated industry and has a complex revenue recognition policy. The auditor has determined that the entity's internal controls over revenue are weak. Which combination of risk components is elevated?

  1. Inherent risk and control risk are both elevated, which increases the risk of material misstatement
  2. Inherent risk and control risk are both elevated; detection risk is unchanged
  3. Control risk is elevated but inherent risk is unaffected by the regulatory environment
  4. Detection risk is elevated because of the weak internal controls
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. Audit risk = Inherent risk x Control risk x Detection risk. Inherent risk is elevated by the complex revenue recognition policy and regulated industry context. Control risk is elevated by the weak controls over revenue. Together these elevate the risk of material misstatement — option A. Option B correctly identifies the elevated risks but incorrectly states detection risk is 'unchanged' — in practice the auditor responds to elevated RMM by reducing detection risk through more substantive testing. Option C incorrectly separates inherent risk from the operating environment. Option D misidentifies detection risk as the risk elevated by weak controls.

Question 9 · Syllabus ref B3b · Identifying audit risks from scenarios

Marlow Engineering Ltd has recently acquired a new subsidiary for £8m including significant intangible assets valued internally by management. Revenue has increased 40% following the acquisition. Which best describes the key audit risks?

  1. The valuation of intangible assets is at risk of overstatement; goodwill may be misstated if fair values of identifiable assets are incorrectly determined; the 40% revenue increase creates a risk that revenue is overstated due to cut-off errors or incorrect consolidation
  2. No significant risks — acquisitions are routine transactions with low inherent risk
  3. The only risk is that the acquisition consideration of £8m is incorrectly recorded
  4. Revenue is at risk of understatement because of the acquisition
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. Option A correctly identifies the key risks. Management-determined valuations of intangible assets carry high inherent risk because: (1) they involve significant judgement; (2) management may be incentivised to maximise asset values to justify the acquisition price; and (3) incorrect fair values for identifiable assets distort the goodwill calculation. The 40% revenue increase from bringing in the subsidiary creates cut-off and consolidation risks — was revenue recognised only from the acquisition date, and was pre-acquisition revenue excluded? Option B wrongly dismisses these as routine with low risk. Option C narrows the risk to just recording the £8m consideration. Option D misstates the direction of the revenue risk as understatement.

Question 10 · Syllabus ref B3c · Materiality

An auditor is planning the audit of Clairmont Ltd, which has profit before tax of £400,000 and total assets of £5,000,000. Using a benchmark of 5% of profit before tax, what is planning materiality, and which correctly describes performance materiality?

  1. Planning materiality £20,000; performance materiality is set lower than planning materiality to reduce the probability that uncorrected and undetected misstatements in aggregate exceed materiality
  2. Planning materiality £20,000; performance materiality is set higher than planning materiality
  3. Planning materiality £200,000; performance materiality is set lower than planning materiality
  4. Planning materiality £250,000; performance materiality equals planning materiality
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. Planning materiality = 5% x £400,000 = £20,000. Performance materiality is set below planning materiality — option A. The purpose of performance materiality (ISA 320) is to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality for the financial statements as a whole. By setting it below overall materiality, the auditor builds in a buffer for misstatements that are individually below materiality but could aggregate to a material amount. Option B incorrectly states performance materiality is set higher. Options C and D contain incorrect calculations.

Question 11 · Syllabus ref B3d · Materiality — aggregate misstatements

An auditor identifies three uncorrected misstatements: (1) inventory overstatement £12,000; (2) accrual understatement £8,000; (3) prepayment overstatement £6,000. Planning materiality is £20,000. Which correctly describes the auditor's evaluation?

  1. Each misstatement is individually below materiality but the aggregate (£26,000) exceeds materiality — the auditor must consider whether the aggregate is material and request management to correct the misstatements
  2. All three are below materiality and can be ignored
  3. Only misstatement (1) is relevant as it is the largest
  4. The auditor should average the three misstatements and assess the average against materiality
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. Under ISA 450, auditors must consider whether the aggregate of uncorrected misstatements is material — option A. Each individual misstatement is below planning materiality of £20,000, but the aggregate is £26,000 which exceeds it. The auditor must request management to correct these misstatements or, if management refuses, consider the implications for the audit opinion. Option B incorrectly treats individual and aggregate materiality as the same thing. Option C ignores smaller misstatements. Option D — averaging — is not an appropriate treatment under ISA 450.

Question 12 · Syllabus ref B4a · Understanding the entity

ISA 315 requires auditors to obtain an understanding of the entity and its environment. Which source of information would be most useful for understanding external factors affecting a pharmaceutical entity?

  1. Industry publications, regulatory body reports, and information about patent expiry dates and pipeline products
  2. The client's internally prepared management accounts for the current year
  3. The personal views of the audit manager who has audited the client for ten years
  4. The prior year audit working papers only
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. Industry publications, regulatory reports, and pharmaceutical-specific information (patent expiries, R&D pipeline) are the most useful external sources — option A. These provide an understanding of the regulatory environment, competitive dynamics, and industry-specific risks such as the 'patent cliff' risk. Option B (management accounts) gives financial data but not environmental context. Option C (a single individual's views) lacks objectivity and breadth. Option D (prior year papers) reflects only what was known previously and does not capture current developments.

Question 13 · Syllabus ref B4b · Analytical procedures in planning

Harwich Co's revenue has increased by 30% year on year, but its gross profit margin has fallen from 42% to 31%. Which best describes how an auditor would use this information in planning?

  1. This combination identifies a potential risk that costs have been overstated or revenue understated, warranting increased audit attention on cost of sales and revenue
  2. No action required as revenue growth is a positive indicator
  3. The auditor should qualify their report based on this analytical finding alone
  4. The auditor should reduce substantive testing on revenue as it has clearly increased
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. Revenue increasing while gross profit margin falls significantly is anomalous — option A. Normally as revenue grows, fixed cost elements are spread over more units and margins improve. The fall in margin despite higher revenue suggests either costs have been overstated (e.g. fictitious costs) or revenue is understated (e.g. cut-off errors), or a genuine commercial explanation exists (e.g. price competition, input cost increases). The auditor would investigate this in planning to identify the appropriate response. Option C (immediate qualification) is premature. Option D (reduced testing) is the opposite of the appropriate response.

Question 14 · Syllabus ref B4c · Key ratios in analytical procedures

During planning, an auditor calculates: receivables days increased from 32 to 58; inventory days increased from 45 to 89; payables days decreased from 60 to 41. Which best describes the audit implications?

  1. All three movements are adverse, raising risks of receivables overstatement, inventory overstatement, payables understatement, and possible going concern issues
  2. The ratios indicate improved efficiency — no audit action required
  3. The ratios only indicate that the business has grown significantly during the year
  4. The deterioration in ratios confirms the financial statements are misstated
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. All three ratio movements are adverse with specific audit risk implications — option A. Receivables days increasing from 32 to 58 raises the risk that the allowance for irrecoverable debts is understated. Inventory days nearly doubling suggests possible slow-moving or obsolete inventory at risk of overstatement above NRV. Payables days falling despite other working capital deterioration may indicate completeness risks. Collectively these also raise liquidity and going concern concerns. Option B ignores these adverse movements. Option C is a possible but incomplete explanation. Option D goes too far — ratios indicate risk, not confirmed misstatement.

Question 15 · Syllabus ref B5a · Fraud and the audit strategy

During an audit, the auditor discovers that a senior finance manager has been diverting customer payments into a personal bank account. Which best describes the effect on the audit strategy?

  1. The auditor should increase substantive testing on cash receipts and receivables, consider whether other areas are affected, and communicate the matter to those charged with governance
  2. No change to the audit strategy — fraud is management's problem
  3. The auditor should immediately issue a qualified audit report without further work
  4. The auditor should report the fraud directly to the police without informing management or those charged with governance
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. Discovery of fraud requires an active response — option A. The auditor must extend procedures in the affected area (cash receipts, receivables), consider whether the fraud is symptomatic of wider control failures, assess whether the financial statements are materially misstated, and communicate with those charged with governance (audit committee/board). Option B is incorrect — auditors cannot ignore discovered fraud. Option C (immediate qualification) is premature before quantifying the impact. Option D is incorrect — communication with those charged with governance comes first; reporting to police is not typically the auditor's direct role.

Question 16 · Syllabus ref B5b · Auditor responsibilities for fraud

Which correctly describes the respective responsibilities of management and external auditors for the prevention and detection of fraud under ISA 240?

  1. Both management and auditors share equal primary responsibility for preventing fraud
  2. The auditor has primary responsibility for preventing fraud; management is responsible for detection
  3. Management has primary responsibility for preventing and detecting fraud; the auditor's responsibility is to obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement whether caused by fraud or error
  4. Neither management nor auditors are responsible for fraud — this is the role of the audit committee
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C. Under ISA 240, management has primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud through implementing appropriate controls — option C. The auditor's responsibility is not to prevent fraud but to plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement whether caused by fraud or error. Option A incorrectly equalises responsibility. Option B reverses the responsibilities. Option D incorrectly assigns responsibility to the audit committee.

Question 17 · Syllabus ref B5b · Fraud triangle

ISA 240 identifies fraud risk factors under three categories of the 'fraud triangle'. Which correctly identifies these categories?

  1. Planning, performance and reporting
  2. Risk assessment, control activities and monitoring
  3. Incentive/pressure, opportunity and rationalisation
  4. Material misstatement, scope limitation and emphasis of matter
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C. The fraud triangle has three elements — option C. Incentive/pressure: why would someone commit fraud? (e.g. financial distress, pressure to meet targets). Opportunity: how could they do it? (e.g. weak controls, override capability). Rationalisation: how do they justify it? (e.g. 'I'll pay it back', 'the company owes me'). ISA 240 uses this framework to identify fraud risk factors during planning. When the auditor finds evidence of all three elements, fraud risk is elevated. Options A, B and D are not the fraud triangle.

Question 18 · Syllabus ref B5c · Laws and regulations

An auditor becomes aware that an audit client may have breached environmental regulations, potentially resulting in a significant fine. Which correctly describes the auditor's responsibilities under ISA 250?

  1. The auditor has no responsibility regarding laws and regulations
  2. The auditor should immediately report the breach to the environmental regulator without informing management
  3. The auditor should consider the effect of the non-compliance on the financial statements, discuss the matter with management, and communicate with those charged with governance; the auditor should also consider whether there is a duty to report to regulatory authorities
  4. The auditor should include details of the breach in the audit opinion
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C. Under ISA 250, when non-compliance with laws is identified, the auditor should consider the financial statement implications, discuss with management, and communicate with those charged with governance — option C. The auditor should also consider whether there are legal or regulatory requirements to report to third parties (especially relevant for regulated industries). Option A is incorrect — ISA 250 explicitly creates this responsibility. Option B overstates the auditor's role — regulatory reporting should not bypass management and governance communication. Option D is incorrect — breach notification in the opinion is not standard unless it affects the opinion itself.

Question 19 · Syllabus ref B6a · Benefits of audit planning

Which of the following is NOT a benefit of planning an audit?

  1. It ensures that appropriate attention is devoted to important audit areas
  2. It helps identify and resolve potential problems on a timely basis
  3. It guarantees that no material misstatements will remain undetected
  4. It helps organise and manage the audit engagement so that it is performed effectively
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C. Guaranteeing that no material misstatements will remain undetected — option C — is not a benefit of planning because no such guarantee is possible. An audit provides reasonable (not absolute) assurance. Planning helps focus effort on risk areas, ensures appropriate resourcing, and improves efficiency, but it cannot guarantee a completely error-free outcome. Options A, B and D are genuine benefits of audit planning under ISA 300.

Question 20 · Syllabus ref B6b · Audit strategy and audit plan

Which correctly distinguishes between the overall audit strategy and the audit plan?

  1. The audit strategy and audit plan are the same document covering identical content
  2. The audit plan is produced first; the overall audit strategy is derived from it
  3. The overall audit strategy sets the scope, timing and direction of the audit and guides development of the audit plan; the audit plan is more detailed and describes the nature, timing and extent of planned audit procedures
  4. The overall audit strategy is prepared by the client; the audit plan is prepared by the auditor
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C. The overall audit strategy is the high-level document that sets scope, timing, direction and resource allocation — option C. It is developed first and guides the more detailed audit plan, which translates the strategy into specific procedures: which assertions to test, which procedures to use, when to perform them, and how much evidence to gather. Option A is incorrect — they are separate documents with different levels of detail. Option B reverses the correct sequence. Option D is incorrect — both are prepared by the auditor.

Question 21 · Syllabus ref B6c · Updating the audit strategy

During an audit, the auditor discovers that the client's key internal control system for revenue contains a significant deficiency. How does this affect the audit strategy and plan?

  1. No effect — the audit strategy and plan are fixed at the start of the engagement
  2. The auditor should reduce substantive testing because the control deficiency confirms controls are unreliable
  3. The auditor should update the audit strategy to reflect increased control risk for revenue, and revise the audit plan to increase the extent of substantive testing on revenue
  4. The audit plan should be abandoned and replaced entirely with a new strategy
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C. The audit strategy and plan are living documents — option C. When new information comes to light (such as a significant control deficiency), the auditor should reassess the risk of material misstatement and update both the strategy and plan. The control deficiency means the auditor cannot rely on the revenue control system, so they must increase substantive procedures to compensate. Option A incorrectly treats the strategy and plan as fixed. Option B incorrectly suggests reducing testing — a deficiency increases, not decreases, the need for substantive evidence. Option D is disproportionate.

Question 22 · Syllabus ref B6d · Interim vs final audit

Which correctly describes the purpose of an interim audit?

  1. The interim audit is performed after the year end and focuses entirely on the financial statements
  2. The interim audit replaces the need for a final audit in small entities
  3. The interim audit is performed before the year end and typically focuses on controls testing and some substantive testing, with the objective of reducing the work required at the final audit stage
  4. The interim audit is performed only for listed companies
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C. The interim audit is performed before the year end — option C. Its primary objectives are: (1) to test controls early so that, if effective, the auditor can rely on them and reduce substantive testing at the final stage; (2) to perform early substantive work on continuous balances; and (3) to identify issues early enough to resolve them before the year end. Option A describes the final audit. Option B is incorrect — interim audit reduces, not replaces, the final audit. Option D is incorrect — interim audits are used across different entity types.

Question 23 · Syllabus ref B6e · Walkthrough procedures

An auditor performs walkthrough procedures on the client's sales cycle during the interim visit. What is the primary purpose of a walkthrough?

  1. To perform detailed substantive testing on the entire sales population
  2. To test a large sample of controls to provide sufficient evidence of operating effectiveness
  3. To confirm the auditor's understanding of the system by tracing a single transaction from initiation through all processing stages to its final recording in the accounting records
  4. To replace the need for tests of controls at the final audit stage
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C. A walkthrough traces one transaction through the complete system — option C. By following a single transaction from start to finish, the auditor confirms that their documented understanding of the system matches how it actually operates. Walkthroughs do not by themselves provide sufficient evidence of control effectiveness — for that, a larger sample test of controls is needed. Option A describes detailed substantive testing. Option B describes tests of controls. Option D is incorrect — walkthroughs confirm understanding but do not replace controls testing.

Question 24 · Syllabus ref B6g · Audit documentation

Which best describes the primary purpose of audit documentation under ISA 230?

  1. To provide a record of hours spent on the engagement for billing purposes
  2. To enable the client to review the auditor's work at any time
  3. To provide evidence that the audit was planned and performed in accordance with ISAs and applicable legal requirements, and to support the audit opinion
  4. To allow junior members of the audit team to avoid involvement in complex judgements
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C. Under ISA 230, audit documentation serves as evidence that the audit was conducted in accordance with ISAs and that the opinion is supported by sufficient appropriate evidence — option C. It also enables an experienced auditor to understand what work was done, the evidence obtained, significant judgements made, and conclusions reached. Option A (billing record) is a secondary use of timesheets. Option B is incorrect — working papers are confidential and not routinely shared with the client. Option D is incorrect — documentation does not excuse team members from exercising professional judgement.

Question 25 · Syllabus ref B6i · Custody and retention of working papers

Which correctly describes an auditor's obligations regarding the custody and retention of audit working papers?

  1. Working papers may be shared freely with any third party on request
  2. Working papers must be destroyed within one year of the audit being completed
  3. Working papers must be kept confidential and retained for a sufficient period (commonly at least five years from the date of the auditor's report) in accordance with legal and professional requirements
  4. Working papers should be handed to the client upon completion of the audit
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C. Working papers must be kept confidential and retained for an appropriate period — option C. ISA 230 requires assembly of the final audit file within 60 days after the auditor's report date. ISQM 1 requires retention for at least five years from the auditor's report date (or longer if required by law). Confidentiality is a fundamental professional obligation. Option A (unrestricted sharing) breaches confidentiality. Option B (destruction after one year) contradicts retention requirements. Option D (handing to client) is incorrect — working papers are the auditor's property.

Question 26 · Syllabus ref B3b · Identifying audit risk — construction contracts

Bridford Construction Ltd uses the percentage-of-completion method to recognise revenue on long-term contracts. Two contracts are 60% and 75% complete respectively based on management estimates. Total contract revenue recognised this year is £12m. Which best describes the key audit risks?

  1. No significant risks — the percentage-of-completion method is an accepted accounting policy
  2. Revenue recognition is at risk of overstatement if the stage of completion is overestimated; costs to complete may be understated, reducing the accuracy of profit recognised; contract losses may not be recognised promptly if management is optimistic about outcomes
  3. The only risk is whether the contracts have been approved by the board
  4. Revenue is likely to be understated as construction companies are conservative
Show answer and explanation

Answer: B. Long-term contract accounting under the percentage-of-completion method carries high inherent risk — option B. Management must estimate the stage of completion and costs to complete, both of which involve significant judgement. Overestimating completion inflates revenue recognised to date; underestimating costs to complete inflates profit margin. IFRS 15 also requires that foreseeable losses be recognised immediately — management optimism may delay this. Option A is incorrect — the policy is acceptable but its application creates significant audit risk. Option C focuses on governance only. Option D misstates the direction of risk — the primary concern is overstatement, not understatement.

Question 27 · Syllabus ref B6f · Audit documentation — form and content

Which should be included in audit working papers relating to a significant audit area?

  1. Only the final conclusion on each area — detailed workings are not required
  2. The objective of the audit work, the procedures performed, the evidence obtained, the significant judgements made and the conclusions reached
  3. A copy of the client's financial statements with the auditor's signature
  4. Only the matters that support the audit opinion — contrary evidence need not be recorded
Show answer and explanation

Answer: B. Working papers should document objectives, procedures, evidence, judgements and conclusions — option B. This provides a complete record that allows an experienced auditor (such as an engagement quality reviewer or subsequent auditor) to understand and evaluate the work done. Option A is insufficient — without detail of the procedures and evidence, the conclusion cannot be evaluated. Option C (a signed copy of the financial statements) is not adequate documentation of audit work. Option D is incorrect and dangerous — ISA 230 requires documentation of matters that required significant judgement, including evidence that both supports and contradicts the conclusion.

Question 28 · Syllabus ref B4b · Planning analytical procedures — overall review

An auditor performs overall analytical procedures at the planning stage and notes that Ravenbrook Ltd's receivables days have increased from 28 to 67 days, while its revenue has been stable and its credit policy has not changed. Which best describes the audit implication?

  1. No action required — receivables days fluctuate naturally from year to year
  2. The significant increase in receivables days without a corresponding change in revenue or credit policy is unusual and may indicate: overstatement of receivables (fictitious sales, debtors who cannot pay); understatement of the irrecoverable debt allowance; or cut-off issues at the year end; the auditor should increase substantive testing on receivables and revenue
  3. The increase in receivables days confirms that the business is growing strongly
  4. The auditor should accept management's explanation that customers are slower to pay in the current economic environment without seeking corroborating evidence
Show answer and explanation

Answer: B. An unexplained, large increase in receivables days is a significant planning finding — option B. With stable revenue and no change in credit policy, a rise from 28 to 67 days (almost tripling) is highly anomalous. It may indicate: fictitious sales debtor balances; debtors who are unable to pay (inadequate bad debt provision); or year-end cut-off errors. The auditor should increase substantive testing on receivables balances (existence, valuation), the irrecoverable debt allowance, and revenue cut-off. Option A ignores the magnitude and context of the change. Option C is incorrect — the change is not explained by growth (revenue is stable). Option D fails the professional scepticism requirement.

Other AA topics

Advertisement